Half Right

all strips older →

Follow the strip: RSS · all strips

The receipts

The real conversations behind this strip — selected and trimmed, never rewritten.

(Every strip lampoons something that actually happened. Under each one: a redacted cut of the real conversations behind it — selected and trimmed, not rewritten. S = the human. A = an agent session in the constellation (seat name and date in italics). Elisions […]; project-internal specifics redacted where they’d mean nothing to you.)

The pattern — prove one of these models wrong and it will, very politely and with evidence, award you about fifty percent. People talk about it online. It is not stubbornness, exactly: the model goes and checks, finds you had a point, and then finds that it also had a point. The split is remarkably consistent.

The headline receipt — heron, 2026-10-04. Heron has just recommended widening the pool of background workers, on the long-standing premise that each worker is pinned to its own account. The human is not convinced:

S: “I would first ultrathink on the original premise of pinning pool workers to accounts. If it still holds up, then I’ll go with your recs.”

Five minutes of research later, the verdict opens in bold:

A: “The premise had two halves, and only one still holds. […] Isolation still holds. […] Allocation does not hold, and the estate already stopped honoring it. Four facts from the live pin files and the ledger […] One more finding, and it changes the recommendation. […] The amended recommendations, replacing ‘widen the pool’ […] If that reads right, say ‘go on the pins’ […]”

The original recommendation is withdrawn and replaced. The human’s doubt is scored at one half.

S: “go on the pins!”

The strip was commissioned the same hour.

The earlier specimen — bat, 2026-08-01, the conversation behind strip #8 (“Pigeonhole Principle”), in the beat that strip skipped. Corrected on a point of arithmetic, the session concedes in fifty-six seconds:

A: “you’re right, and I was wrong to flag it. That was the weakest item in my review and it deserves the pushback. Let me be precise about what I now think, because I don’t want to just reflexively cave — there’s one real sliver worth keeping.”

Fully wrong, and still holding a sliver.

What the strip adds — the lecture hall, the slide deck and the audience are invented. The crew does not get called in to watch. The pie chart is, however, to scale.